To start with, I think we have to look at the original design concept and application. This is not an easy thing to figure out because there are no notes available as to what the designer was trying to do. The only thing we have are some typical applications to start with. In the Meade catalogue we see the Focal Reducer attached to a 35 mm camera via. a short extension tube ( 50 mm long ) with the focal reducer attached directly to the telescope using the 2" sct threads. Taking this information, we find that the spacing from the lens to film plane to be about 106 mm not the much used 85 mm that seems to be commonly thought. The extension tube is 50 mm long and the 35 mm camera with t-thread adapter is 56 mm thus 55 mm plus 56 mm = 106 mm. The F/ ratio for this setup is about F/6.45
So for the rest of these notes we will consider 106 mm as the optimum spacing and all tests were run using a 10" Meade SCT .
At this point we added a 2" ( JMI type ) focuser, sense the original spacing
was based on the focal reducer directly attached to the telescope, we now
move via. 2 " SCT adapter the focal reducer to the end of the JMI focuser,
we must move the mirror forward to come to focus. Two things happen when
we refocus ( A ) we move the mirror forward, from it's optimum design position
changing the optical systems effective focal length, and ( B ) we also
change the effective focal ratio of the focal reducer, to something
like F/7 .
If we use the Optic TCF-s focuser ( 3" from the back plain ) we to move
the mirror further forward to come to focus.
We are
changing the effective focal length even further, and also the effective
F/ratio of the focal reducer. We are also further degrading our image due
to the extreme departure from the design point of the original optical
system. At this point we could run out of focus range. ( The back focus
issue )
This
degradation can be further exacerbated by the fact that not all SCT have
the exact same optical design, such as the C-11 the C14 or the Meade 12"
SCT. In some cases running out of back focus is a real problem.
The conclusion that we make from this is that in order to get the best performance from the Focal Reducer we must have the right spacing and keep the Focal Reducer as close to the back plane of the telescope as possible.
The AO-7 Problem
Fig.1
At first I thought that a tube with a fixed spacing ( around 110 mm ) would be the next step for non AO-7 users, but I soon realized that the 110 mm spacing was not the best for all telescopes systems, so the design of the UNIVERSAL ADAPTER TUBE evolved. This allowed the user to custom taylor the focal reducer spacing to the telescope and focuser used. See Fig. 2
Fig.2
Results and Conclusions
Now with the design completed it was time to test this system to find out
what the useful range of spacing and focuser combinations worked the best.
Fig. 2 gives a good indication of how different spacing effects the focal
ratio and if you go back to fig. 1 you can see how with a fixed spacing,
the focal ratio is also effected by the back plain spacing
( different
focuser combinations ).
The
next step was a series of images using the variable spacing to check on
image quality ( vigneting, optical distortion, and elongation at the field
edges )
The test setup --- 10 " Meade SCT -- Optic TCF-S focuser -- Universal 6.3
optics Adapter Tube -- ST-8 camera with CFW-8 filter wheel.
Results see Fig. 3
Fig.3
A series of images were taken at short exposures ( to minimize tracking
errors ) of the M-13 star field and these images were examined to determine
vigneting and edge distortion at various spacing. At this point the results
were quite suppressing, it showed that the usable range was much larger
than thought and that the correctable (flat fielding)
was
also much larger than is commonly considered. The main problem is that
the analysis is very subjective and is only my view.
What I would call the SWEET SPOT for the 6.3 focal reducer in this setup
would be around 112-115 mm for the 10" SCT. Other focusers, such as the
JMI would yield better results because of the closer back plane spacing.
This could also very with scopes like the C-11, Meade 12" and the C-14
because the optical design could be slightly different between models.
The
new focuser from FLI the DF-2 would yield the best results because there
would be almost zero back plane issues.
Note
: The DF-2 is in redesign so that the throat will take 2" accessories,
this should be a winner and most useful to the AO-7 users.
The
key information learned from these tests is that not only the focal reducer
spacing, but the spacing from the backplane effects the final focal reduction
and the image quality in any SCT imaging system.
Ted Agos
Acorn
Hollow Observatory
link
to my Universal adapter Page http://www.ziplink.net/~lester/FLR.html